transport sony vegas file to final cut pro 10

#TRANSPORT SONY VEGAS FILE TO FINAL CUT PRO 10 FULL#
#TRANSPORT SONY VEGAS FILE TO FINAL CUT PRO 10 PROFESSIONAL#

If you render from interlaced to progressive, need to pay attention to deinterlacing options in the project.

#TRANSPORT SONY VEGAS FILE TO FINAL CUT PRO 10 FULL#

Similarly, very flexible rendering options - choose encoder and full range of parameters. Can change the settings anytime for the existing project, which, AFAIK, Premiere cannot do. I will list some pros and cons I have for Vegas, and you decide whether any of these important for you.Įxtremely flexible for setting up project's resolution, frame rate, interlaced/progressive, etc. I am a longtime Vegas user, but have never used FCP. On the other hand, I doubt Michael Bay uses Vegas much. Update: It has been a while since I've used Vegas, but I would guess that it would be a perfectly adequate tool for internal corporate communications work. But those tools will depend on the other professionals that you work with. If you can produce a product pleasing to your client with Vegas, then go right ahead.įor larger projects where you need to share your intermediate work with other professionals, you may need to use the same tools that they use. (I'm sure someone has manually drawn animation frames with Paint and stacked them up for a music video or short animated logo)įor small projects that you can complete entirely by yourself, all that matters is the final output. The problem is that 'professional and semi-professional work' is such a broad field that you will always be able to find some situation where some tool is appropriate.

#TRANSPORT SONY VEGAS FILE TO FINAL CUT PRO 10 PROFESSIONAL#

Of course you can compare the output of Vegas with other professional production tools. Of course you can use Vegas for professional and semi-professional work. The way you've phrased this question makes it meaningless. Which one is the best for the job? No one's comparing MSPaint to 's just a tool, and if you use it right, you'll be very pleased wit the results. It doesn't matter if Vegas in the flathead or the phillips and FCP the other. It's just that for some projects, I need a phillips head and for some I need a flathead. Conversely, light and mic a two year old's dance recital, shoot it with three Steadicams for proper coverage, and you'll get something worthy of a broadcast dance show. Shoot a corporate video with the onboard mic, no tripod and no lights and Eisenstein himself couldn't make that a professional looking edit. Professionalism comes from a.) the footage and b.) the skill of the editor. The tool, in and of itself, it not the issue. Needless to say, though, our material from FCP and Vegas has been used in every media from Broadcast to family videos.

Whether using FCP or Vegas, the output is comparable, I'm not saying identical because of inherent differences in how MacOS/FCP and Windows/Vegas implement the various output codecs.

On the other hand, my Vegas setup chokes on Canon HDV, so that gets edited on FCP. When FCP imports those formats, it ranges from not recognizing the file to displaying interlace artifacts. If there's something with Sony's proprietary HD format that's somewhere between HDV and XDCAM, or DSLR footage from a Nikon, I edit because Vegas imports those clips easily. There's no clean way to export an EDL between our two systems so that we can BOTH edit. I've also used it for semi-professional things like editing a video of my stepdaughter's choir concert for a Christmas DVD. I use it regularly for professional work from spots, to corporate video to feature films.

Transport sony vegas file to final cut pro 10